Skip to main content
The Accounts Protocol defines the commercial layer beneath all AdCP vendor protocols. Every transaction — a media buy, a data signal, a content standards check — happens between parties that have a commercial relationship. The Accounts Protocol establishes that relationship and provides consumption reporting so vendors can track how their services were used.

The commercial model

Six questions underlie every AdCP transaction:
QuestionAnswered byMechanism
Who is the advertiser?Brand registrybrand.domain resolves to brand.json
Who operates on the brand’s behalf?Brand registryauthorized_operators in brand.json declares who can buy on the brand’s behalf
How does the operator authenticate?Seller capabilitiesrequire_operator_auth determines the account model: true means explicit accounts (operator credentials required, discover via list_accounts), false means implicit accounts (agent trusted, declare via sync_accounts)
Who gets billed?Buyer declarationBuyer passes billing in sync_accountsoperator, agent, or advertiser. Seller accepts or rejects.
What was consumed?Usage reportingreport_usage informs vendor agents how their services were used after delivery
The seller declares the account model in get_adcp_capabilities via require_operator_auth. When true (explicit accounts), operators authenticate independently and the buyer discovers accounts via list_accounts. When false (implicit accounts), the agent is trusted and the buyer declares brand/operator pairs via sync_accounts to provision accounts. An ad network may use both models simultaneously — implicit accounts on the buyer-facing side (the network is agent-trusted) and explicit accounts with each underlying platform (the network authenticates as an operator). See the Sponsored Intelligence guide — account model for networks for the full account chain: buyer agent → network (implicit) → AI platform (explicit). After delivery, the orchestrator calls report_usage to inform vendor agents (signals, governance, creative) how their services were consumed. This is not settlement — it’s consumption reporting so the vendor can track earned revenue and verify billing.

Scope

The Accounts Protocol applies across all vendor protocols. An orchestrator establishes an account once per brand/operator pair per vendor agent and reuses the same account reference across all interactions with that agent:
Vendor ProtocolAccount reference used for
Media BuyRate cards, invoicing, campaign attribution
SignalsPer-account pricing options, activation, usage reporting
GovernanceContent standards billing
CreativeCreative service billing
The account reference may be a seller-assigned account_id (explicit accounts, require_operator_auth: true) or a natural key — brand + operator (implicit accounts, require_operator_auth: false). For sandbox, the path depends on the account model: explicit accounts discover pre-existing test accounts via list_accounts, while implicit accounts declare sandbox via sync_accounts with sandbox: true. See Account references for details.

Account Status Lifecycle

Accounts progress through a defined set of states. Terminal states (rejected, closed) allow no further transitions.
sync_accounts ──▶ pending_approval ──▶ active
                       │                  │
                       │ (seller declines) ├── (credit limit / funds depleted)
                       ▼                  │    ▼
                   rejected (terminal)    │  payment_required
                                          │    │ (buyer resolves billing)
                                          │    ▼
                                          │  active

                                          ├── (seller suspends) ──▶ suspended
                                          │                           │
                                          │    (seller reactivates) ◀─┤
                                          │                           │
                                          │                           └──▶ closed (terminal)

                                          └── (seller or buyer closes) ──▶ closed (terminal)
Transition rules:
  • pending_approvalactive: seller approves after credit/contract/identity review
  • pending_approvalrejected: seller declines. Terminal — buyer must submit a new account request.
  • activepayment_required: automatic when credit limit is reached or funds are depleted
  • payment_requiredactive: when the buyer resolves the outstanding balance. Sellers MAY auto-transition or MAY require manual re-activation.
  • activesuspended: seller-initiated (policy violation, billing dispute, fraud review). Sellers MUST notify orchestrators via webhook.
  • suspendedactive: seller-initiated reactivation
  • suspendedclosed: seller-initiated permanent closure
  • activeclosed: seller or buyer-initiated permanent closure. Terminal.
  • Sellers MUST reject operations on accounts in terminal states with ACCOUNT_NOT_FOUND or an appropriate error

Operations by Account Status

Account status acts as a gate on which tasks are permitted. Read-only operations are always available; mutation operations are restricted based on status.
Taskactivepending_approvalpayment_requiredsuspendedrejected / closed
list_accountsYesYesYesYesYes
get_account_financialsYesYesYesYesNo
get_productsYesNoYesNoNo
create_media_buyYesNoNoNoNo
update_media_buyYesNoYesNoNo
get_media_buysYesNoYesYesNo
sync_creativesYesNoYesNoNo
sync_catalogsYesNoYesNoNo
sync_event_sourcesYesNoYesNoNo
report_usageYesNoYesYesNo
  • payment_required blocks new spend (create_media_buy) but allows managing existing buys and resolving setup. Sellers SHOULD also reject new_packages within update_media_buy when the account is in payment_required, since adding packages is functionally equivalent to new spend.
  • suspended allows read-only access to existing data but blocks all mutations
  • Sellers MUST return ACCOUNT_SUSPENDED for blocked operations on suspended accounts and ACCOUNT_PAYMENT_REQUIRED for blocked operations on payment-required accounts

Transaction lifecycle

1. Discover seller capabilities
   get_adcp_capabilities → require_operator_auth, supported_billing

2. Resolve brand identity
   Fetch brand.domain/.well-known/brand.json → canonical brand (domain, brand_id)

3. Verify operator identity
   Check authorized_operators in brand.json → confirm operator is permitted to buy for this brand

4. Authenticate (if required)
   When require_operator_auth is true → obtain operator credential via authorization_endpoint or out-of-band

5. Establish account reference
   Explicit (require_operator_auth: true):
     list_accounts() → find existing account_id for this brand/operator
   Implicit (require_operator_auth: false):
     sync_accounts({ accounts: [{ brand, operator, billing, billing_entity? }] }) → status, billing terms

6. Execute
   Protocol tasks use the account reference to apply correct rates and terms
   Examples: get_products(account: {...}), create_media_buy(account: {...})

7. Report usage
   report_usage(usage: [{ account: {...}, operator_id, kind, vendor_cost, ... }])
   Informs vendor agents how their services were consumed after delivery

Principals

The Accounts Protocol operates with four principal types. See Accounts and agents for full details on billing hierarchy, trust models, and authorized operators.
PrincipalRoleIdentified by
BrandWhose products are advertisedbrand.domain + optional brand.brand_id via brand.json
OperatorWho drives the buysDomain (e.g., pinnacle-media.com)
AgentWhat software places the buysAuthenticated session
Vendor agentThe seller’s AdCP agentagent_url

Tasks

TaskPurpose
sync_accountsDeclare brand/operator pairs and billing; provision accounts (implicit accounts, require_operator_auth: false)
list_accountsDiscover existing accounts (explicit accounts, require_operator_auth: true); poll status on pending accounts
get_account_financialsQuery spend, credit, and invoice status for operator-billed accounts
sync_governanceSync governance agent endpoints to accounts for seller-side validation
report_usageInform vendor agents how their services were consumed after delivery

Brand registry connection

The brand.domain in account references is not an arbitrary identifier — it is the brand’s domain, resolvable to a brand.json file that declares the brand’s canonical identity, sub-brands, authorized operators, and properties. Vendor agents can verify buyer claims against the brand registry: if an orchestrator claims to represent acme-corp.com, the vendor can fetch acme-corp.com/.well-known/brand.json to confirm authorized operators and brand hierarchy. This makes the Accounts Protocol tamper-resistant — account relationships are grounded in publicly verifiable brand identity. See the Brand Protocol for how brand identity resolution works.

Counterparty verification

Every commercial relationship in advertising depends on knowing who you’re actually doing business with. The Accounts Protocol addresses this at the protocol level through the brand registry. When an orchestrator references an account, the brand.domain identifies the advertiser. Vendor agents can fetch brand.domain/.well-known/brand.json to verify:
  • Brand identity: Is this brand who they claim to be?
  • Operator authorization: Is the operator listed in the request actually authorized to buy on this brand’s behalf?
  • Brand hierarchy: Which sub-brands does this house portfolio include?
This verification is grounded in publicly accessible DNS-hosted identity — not in what the buyer agent asserts, but in what the brand itself has declared. The pending_approval account state is where human review occurs: credit checks, legal agreements, and identity verification. Vendor agents that require these steps return a setup.url for the human to complete the process before the account becomes active.

Brand registry and the contribute-back pattern

The AgenticAdvertising.org brand registry provides a community-maintained layer of brand identity for brands that haven’t yet published their own brand.json. Buyer agents resolving brands before account setup can contribute data back to the registry as a byproduct of normal workflows — improving identity coverage for the ecosystem without extra effort. The recommended pattern for buyer agents uses three building blocks (see #1166):
ToolPurpose
resolve_brandCheck registry and fetch brand.json — returns canonical identity if available
research_brandEnrich via Brandfetch and auto-save to registry as enriched
save_brandManually contribute a brand to the registry as community
async function ensureBrand(domain) {
  // 1. Check registry (brand.json or previously resolved)
  const resolved = await resolveBrand(domain);

  if (resolved.errors) {
    // Resolution failed — brand unknown, proceed to enrich
  } else if (resolved.source === 'brand_json' || resolved.source === 'enriched') {
    // Authoritative or enriched data available — confirm with user, then use
    return await confirmWithUser(resolved);
  }
  // source === 'community': registry has a placeholder, but enrich for richer data

  // 2. Enrich via Brandfetch — auto-saves to registry as 'enriched'
  const enriched = await researchBrand(domain);
  if (enriched.errors) {
    // Enrichment unavailable — fall back to community entry or prompt user to correct
    return resolved ? await confirmWithUser(resolved) : null;
  }

  // 3. Confirm with user before using enriched data
  // Enrichment is third-party — user confirmation catches errors and improves registry quality
  return await confirmWithUser(enriched);
}
confirmWithUser is a placeholder for whatever confirmation mechanism fits your UX — an explicit prompt, a review step in a workflow UI, or a low-confidence flag that triggers human review. The confirmation step is what makes the improvement loop work: enrichment data comes from third parties and isn’t guaranteed to be correct. User verification before the data is used in a live campaign is what keeps the registry accurate over time.

Source authority

The registry tracks where brand data came from. Sources in descending authority:
SourceMeaningCan be overwritten?
brand_jsonBrand self-declared via /.well-known/brand.jsonNo — returns 409
enrichedThird-party enrichment (Brandfetch)Only by higher authority
communityManually contributed by a registry memberYes
When an agent calls save_brand or research_brand, the registry applies merge logic: existing fields from a higher-authority source are preserved, and only missing fields are filled in. This respects what brands have declared while filling gaps. research_brand skips re-enrichment if the registry already has recent enriched data for the domain, avoiding redundant API calls. The full edit history for any brand — who contributed, when, and with what summary — is queryable via GET /api/brands/history.

Property contribute-back

The same pattern applies to publisher properties. When a buyer agent discovers a new publisher through a sales agent interaction, it can contribute that property back to the registry via POST /api/properties/save. This improves property coverage for the ecosystem the same way brand contribute-back improves brand coverage. See Registry API — save property for details.

Usage reporting

Vendor agents (signals, governance, creative) are not direct participants in campaign execution — the orchestrator uses their services as inputs to a media buy. After delivery, report_usage tells these vendors what was consumed so they can track earned revenue and verify billing. report_usage is buyer-reported: the orchestrator computes and reports consumption. Each record carries its own account, operator_id, and kind ("signal", "content_standards", "creative"). The vendor agent uses the reported pricing_option_id to verify the correct rate was applied. Partial acceptance is valid — a single request can span multiple accounts, operators, and campaigns. The response confirms how many records were accepted and which (if any) failed validation.