Campaign Governance

AdCP Campaign Governance validates autonomous media buys against authorized plans, budget limits, and compliance policies using three-party trust.

Campaign Governance Protocol

Campaign Governance provides automated validation for buy-side advertising transactions. When AI agents buy media autonomously, Campaign Governance acts as an independent review layer — validating every action against authorized plans, brand policies, budget limits, and compliance requirements.

The problem

An AI agent interprets a brief, picks a seller, negotiates a media buy, and takes it live — all without a human watching. This is the “no eyes” problem: autonomous agents making real financial commitments with no independent check that the purchase matches what was authorized.

The existing AdCP governance domains solve where ads run (Property Governance), what content is adjacent (Content Standards), what creatives are safe (Creative Governance), and who the brand is (Brand Protocol). None of them govern what gets bought and why.

Without a governance layer on the buy side:

• An agent could exceed authorized budgets or reallocate spend outside approved parameters
• The agent could misinterpret a brief — buying in New Mexico when the brief said Mexico
• Targeting could drift in ways that violate brand policy or create discriminatory patterns
• Seller responses could differ from what was requested, with no automated verification
• Compliance policies are fragmented — copy-pasted as natural language strings into every campaign plan, with no standard library and no separation between who defines policies and who executes campaigns

Campaign Governance fills this gap with three mechanisms: plans that define what’s allowed (independent of the agent), seller-side governance checks that verify purchases independently of the buyer, and a policy registry that standardizes compliance rules across governance agents.

Governance supports incremental adoption — organizations configure their governance agent to start in audit mode (log everything, approve everything), move to advisory (flag violations without blocking), and eventually enforce (block on violations). See the safety model for the adoption path. Mode is internal to the governance agent, not a protocol field.

Industry precedent

Campaign Governance formalizes patterns that exist in ad tech today as manual processes:

Manual process	Campaign Governance equivalent
Agency trading desk QA	Automated validation against the IO
DSP pre-bid rules	Budget authority and targeting compliance checks
Advertiser approval workflows	Human escalation for high-risk actions
Post-campaign audit	Seller verification and delivery validation
Compliance review	Regulatory checks by jurisdiction

How it works

The orchestrator pushes campaign plans via sync_plans, then calls check_governance with tool + payload before every action it sends to a seller. The seller independently calls check_governance with media_buy_id + planned_delivery before executing. After receiving the seller’s response, the orchestrator calls report_plan_outcome to close the loop. The governance agent tracks budget from confirmed outcomes — not just attempted actions.

Three parties participate in campaign governance:

• The orchestrator validates actions against the plan before sending them to sellers (buyer-side governance loop).
• The seller independently checks purchases by calling the buyer’s governance agent with its planned delivery parameters (seller-side governance check).
• The governance agent validates both the orchestrator’s intended actions and the seller’s planned delivery against the same campaign plan.

This creates a trust model where neither the buyer nor the seller can unilaterally misrepresent what was approved. The orchestrator cannot skip governance (the seller checks independently), and the seller cannot deliver something different from what was approved (the governance agent has a record of the planned delivery).

Separation of duties

Campaign Governance enforces an automated separation between who defines policies and who executes campaigns:

• The policy team selects applicable compliance policies from the policy registry, configures brand-specific rules, and maintains the brand’s compliance profile. This configuration lives at the brand level (in brand.json), not in individual campaign plans.
• The buying team (or agency) operates the orchestrator, creates campaign plans, and executes media buys. Plans specify campaign context — budget, channels, flight dates, authorized markets — and can reference additional registry policies or campaign-specific rules when needed.
• The governance agent resolves applicable policies from the brand’s compliance configuration and validates every orchestrator action against them.

The orchestrator cannot bypass or modify the brand’s compliance policies — those are resolved from the brand configuration by the governance agent. Plans can layer on additional policies via policy_ids and custom_policies, but the brand’s baseline always applies. When a regulation changes, the policy team updates the brand configuration once and all active campaigns pick up the change automatically.

Policy resolution

The governance agent resolves applicable policies through the brand reference in the plan:

1. The plan includes brand.domain (required) and optionally countries/regions (authorized markets for this campaign)
2. The governance agent resolves the brand via the Brand Protocol and retrieves its compliance configuration
3. The brand configuration references standardized policies from the policy registry by ID and includes any custom brand-specific policies
4. The governance agent intersects these policies with the plan’s authorized markets — only policies applicable to those markets are active for this plan
5. The resolved policy set is what gets evaluated during check_governance
6. Media buys targeting outside the authorized markets are denied regardless of policy compliance

The policy registry is a community-maintained library of standardized, machine-readable advertising compliance policies — covering jurisdictions (UK HFSS restrictions, US COPPA, EU GDPR), policy categories (children directed, pharmaceutical, fair housing, fair employment), and brand safety baselines. Brands select applicable policies from the registry rather than writing their own.

The governance loop

Every seller interaction follows a before/after pattern:

1. Before: The orchestrator calls check_governance with tool and payload — the action it intends to send. The governance agent returns a status.
2. Execute: If approved, the orchestrator sends the action to the seller, including plan_id and governance_context.
3. Check: If the account has governance_agents, the seller calls check_governance with media_buy_id and planned_delivery — what it will actually deliver. The governance agent approves or denies.
4. After: The orchestrator calls report_plan_outcome with the seller’s response. The governance agent updates its state and flags any discrepancies.

This pattern applies to discovery (get_products), purchase (create_media_buy, update_media_buy), and periodic delivery reporting.

Planned delivery

When a seller confirms a media buy, it returns a planned_delivery object describing what it will actually deliver — the geographic targeting, channels, flight dates, frequency caps, and budget it will use. This may differ from what the buyer requested (e.g., the seller may apply additional frequency caps or adjust geo to match available inventory).

planned_delivery serves two purposes:

1. Governance check: The seller sends planned_delivery to the buyer’s governance agent, which confirms it matches the campaign plan. This prevents the seller from delivering something the buyer didn’t approve.
2. Discrepancy detection: The buyer can compare planned_delivery against the original request and flag differences via report_plan_outcome, catching configuration drift before delivery begins.

Seller-side governance checks

Buyer-side governance has a trust limitation: the orchestrator attests to its own compliance. An LLM agent could hallucinate governance approval, skip validation, or misrepresent what was validated. You can’t trust the agent that’s spending money to also be the one that checks whether spending that money is OK.

Seller-side governance checks solve this. The buyer syncs governance agents (URLs with credentials) via sync_governance. When the seller receives a create_media_buy, it calls the governance agent with what it plans to deliver. The governance agent checks against the plan and returns approved, denied, or conditions.

This also catches misinterpretation. If the brief says “Mexico” and the seller interprets it as “New Mexico,” the governance agent sees the geo mismatch against the plan and denies the buy — before it goes live.

The webhook covers the full media buy lifecycle:

• Purchase: POST before confirming create_media_buy — is this buy approved?
• Modification: POST before confirming update_media_buy — is this change OK?
• Delivery: POST periodically during delivery — is delivery still on track?

The governance agent maintains all state. The seller just posts what’s happening — no chaining, no conversation history, no state to track across servers.

Governance checks are optional at every phase. Sellers can start with purchase-only (one POST per buy) and add modification and delivery checks incrementally. See the specification for the full protocol.

Sellers that implement governance checks gain a competitive advantage: they can prove to buyers that purchases were independently verified before execution. This reduces dispute risk, automates compliance verification, and signals trust to buyers with strict oversight requirements.

Adoption path

Governance agents support incremental adoption through their internal mode configuration. The protocol surface is the same regardless of mode — callers always receive approved, denied, or conditions and act on the status. How the governance agent arrives at that decision is its own concern.

In practice, organizations configure their governance agent to progress through three stages:

1. Audit — Log everything, approve everything. The governance agent evaluates fully but always returns approved with findings attached. The organization reviews findings to assess false positive rates and calibrate policies.
2. Advisory — Return real statuses (denied, conditions) but the organization treats denials as non-blocking. Humans review findings post-hoc.
3. Enforce — Block on violations. The default for production governance.

This works the same way for a single brand buying direct and for a holding company with 35 brands and multiple agency partners.

For small brands

A brand buying direct (no agency, no policy team) still gets:

• Automated budget limits and geo enforcement from the campaign plan
• Compliance coverage from the policy registry — registry policies are community-maintained, no per-brand configuration required
• Seller-side verification via governance checks
• Full audit trail via get_plan_audit_logs

Set authority_level: "agent_limited" with a reallocation_threshold to define guardrails. The governance agent handles the rest.

For multi-agency and holding company setups

Plans support delegations that scope which agents can execute against a plan — by authority level, budget limit, market, and expiration. A brand can delegate full authority to one agency for European markets and execute_only authority to another for North America.

For holding companies managing multiple brands, portfolio governance defines cross-brand constraints: total portfolio spend caps, shared policy enforcement, and corporate-level exclusions that no individual brand plan can override.

Finding confidence

Governance findings include optional confidence scores (0-1) that distinguish “this definitely violates GDPR” (0.95) from “this might violate depending on how audience segments resolve” (0.6). This helps brands respond appropriately — high-confidence findings can be auto-resolved, medium-confidence findings get flagged for human review.

Drift detection

The audit log includes aggregate metrics — human review rate, auto-approval rate, human override rate — with trend indicators. A declining human review rate may mean the system is well-calibrated or that oversight is eroding. Surfacing the trend lets the organization make that call.

Lifecycle phases

Campaign Governance is stateful across three phases:

Phase	When	What gets validated
Discovery	Before get_products	Search intent matches plan, products from authorized sellers, prices reasonable
Purchase	Before create_media_buy / update_media_buy	Budget within limits, targeting compliant, flight dates match, creative assignments appropriate
Delivery	Periodic reporting	Pacing within parameters, spend rate consistent, delivery metrics on track

Each phase builds on context from earlier phases. During purchase, the governance agent knows which products were discovered (and approved) during discovery. During delivery, it monitors execution against what was purchased.

Validation categories

Category	What it checks
budget_authority	Spend within authorized limits, per-seller concentration, reallocation magnitude
strategic_alignment	Channel mix, audience match, publisher quality tier, brief consistency
bias_fairness	Protected category targeting, audience composition, disparate impact. Matches audience selectors against restricted_attributes defined by the plan’s policy_categories
regulatory_compliance	Jurisdiction-specific regulations resolved from the brand’s compliance configuration and the plan’s authorized countries/regions
seller_verification	Configuration accuracy, undisclosed changes, delivery plausibility
brand_policy	Brand-level compliance policies resolved from the brand configuration and policy registry — competitor separation, category adjacency, custom brand rules

Governance agents declare which categories they evaluate via get_adcp_capabilities.

Statuses

Every governance check returns a structured status:

Status	Meaning	Caller action
approved	Passes all checks	Proceed
denied	Violates a hard policy	Do not proceed; report to user
conditions	Could pass with specific changes	Apply conditions, re-call check_governance

Finding severity levels indicate urgency:

• info — Logged for audit. Used on approved responses for informational findings.
• warning — Human should review. Used on approved responses when action is allowed but attention is needed.
• critical — Action is blocked. Used on denied responses.

When the governance agent determines that human review is required (e.g., the action exceeds the plan’s authority_level thresholds), the task goes async — it returns standard async task lifecycle statuses and eventually resolves to approved or denied once the human acts. This integrates with the existing AdCP async task mechanism. The caller does not need special handling beyond supporting async tasks (see task lifecycle).

Relationship to other governance domains

Campaign Governance composes with the existing domains — it does not duplicate them:

Domain	Relationship
Property Governance	Campaign Governance validates that the orchestrator uses property lists correctly (e.g., not bypassing them). Property Governance provides the lists.
Content Standards	Campaign Governance validates that content standards references are included in media buys. Content Standards handles the actual content evaluation.
Creative Governance	Campaign Governance validates that creative assignments match format requirements. Creative Governance scans the creatives themselves.
Brand Protocol	Campaign Governance resolves the brand’s compliance configuration via the Brand Protocol. The brand’s policy team configures compliance policies in brand.json; the governance agent applies them automatically.

Next steps

Safety model

How the three-party trust model, separation of duties, and structural controls make agentic advertising safe.

Specification

Data models, validation logic, capability declaration, and orchestrator integration patterns.

Tasks

Task reference: sync_plans, check_governance, report_plan_outcome, and get_plan_audit_logs.